Longitudinal bidirectional associations between diabetic retinopathy and diagnosed depression: Results from a Danish nationwide registry-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a feared complication and a leading course of visual impairment, but the connection between DR and depression including the direction has never been studied in a nationwide cohort. We aimed to assess, whether the associations between DR and diagnosed depression are bidirectional. METHODS: We performed a national register-based cohort study of individuals with type 2 diabetes, who attended diabetic eye screening between January 2013 and June 2022. Level of DR was extracted from the Danish Registry of Diabetic Retinopathy. The severity of DR was assessed according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy severity scale. Diagnosed depression was ascertained by physician diagnostic codes of unipolar depression (F32), recurrent depression (F33) or dysthymia (F34.1) from the Danish National Patient Register. We estimated presence of diagnosed depression according to DR level at index date and risk of diagnosed depression during follow-up using multivariable logistic and Cox regression, respectively. Secondly, we assessed whether diagnosed depression at index date could predict incident DR. RESULTS: We included 240,893 individuals with type 2 diabetes with baseline rates of diagnosed depression ranging from 5.2 to 6.0 % for DR level 1-4. At index date, individuals with type 2 diabetes and DR were less likely to have a history of diagnosed depression (multivariable adjusted OR, 0.77 [95 % CI 0.73-0.82]). In 226,523 individuals with type 2 diabetes followed for 1,159,755 person-years, 1.7 % developed at least one episode of diagnosed depression. In a model adjusted for age and sex, individuals with DR at index date had an increased risk of incident diagnosed depression compared to those without DR (HR 1.25 [95 % CI 1.16-1.36]). Adjusting for marital status, use of glucose-, lipid- and blood pressure lowering medication, HbA1c, diabetic neuropathy and Charlson comorbidity index waived the above risk (multivariable adjusted HR 1.02 [95 % CI 0.93-1.12]). Furthermore a previous history of diagnosed depression was not associated with increased risk of incident DR (multivariable adjusted HR 0.89 [95 % CI 0.77-1.03]). CONCLUSION: In this nationwide cohort study, individuals with DR at first screening were 23 % less likely to have a history of depression, but our data did not support a bidirectional association between DR and depression. Selection bias may have occurred as diagnosed depression is a known barrier for attending DR-screening.

Performance of a Support Vector Machine Learning Tool for Diagnosing Diabetic Retinopathy in Clinical Practice.

PURPOSE: To examine the real-world performance of a support vector machine learning software (RetinaLyze) in order to identify the possible presence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with diabetes via software implementation in clinical practice. METHODS: 1001 eyes from 1001 patients-one eye per patient-participating in the Danish National Screening Programme were included. Three independent ophthalmologists graded all eyes according to the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale with the exact level of disease being determined by majority decision. The software detected DR and no DR and was compared to the ophthalmologists' gradings. RESULTS: At a clinical chosen threshold, the software showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 84.9% (95% CI: 81.8-87.9), 89.9% (95% CI: 86.8-92.7), 92.1% (95% CI: 89.7-94.4), and 81.0% (95% CI: 77.2-84.7), respectively, when compared to human grading. The results from the routine screening were 87.0% (95% CI: 84.2-89.7), 85.3% (95% CI: 81.8-88.6), 89.2% (95% CI: 86.3-91.7), and 82.5% (95% CI: 78.5-86.0), respectively. AUC was 93.4%. The reference graders Conger's Exact Kappa was 0.827. CONCLUSION: The software performed similarly to routine grading with overlapping confidence intervals, indicating comparable performance between the two groups. The intergrader agreement was satisfactory. However, evaluating the updated software alongside updated clinical procedures is crucial. It is therefore recommended that further clinical testing before implementation of the software as a decision support tool is conducted.

Bariatric surgery in individuals with type 2 diabetes is not associated with short or long-term risk of diabetic retinopathy progression: results from a nationwide cohort study.

AIMS: Bariatric surgery is used to induce weight loss and glycemic stability in type 2 diabetes (T2D). It has been a concern that this may lead to early worsening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) due to a rapid decline in HbA1c. In this study, we evaluated the risk of short and long-term DR development and need for ocular intervention in an entire nation of individuals with T2D undergoing bariatric surgery. METHODS: The study comprised a national, register-based cohort of individuals with T2D screened for DR. Cases were matched by age, sex and DR level at the date of surgery (index date) with non-bariatric controls. We extracted information on DR levels, in- and outpatient treatments, pharmaceutical prescriptions and laboratory values. We evaluated worsening of DR (incident and progressive DR) at follow-up (6 and 36 months). RESULTS: Amongst 238,967 individuals with T2D, who attended diabetic eye screening, we identified 553 that underwent bariatric surgery (0.2%) and 2677 non-bariatric controls. Median age was 49 years, and 63% were female. Cases had more comorbidities, lower HbA1c as well as more frequent use of glucose-lowering and antihypertensive medication than controls at index date. In a fully adjusted logistic regression model, the risk of DR worsening for cases was not significantly different compared to controls, neither short-term (OR 0.41 [CI 95% 0.13; 1.33], p = 0.14) nor long-term (OR 0.64 [CI 95% 0.33; 1.24], p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide study, bariatric surgery did not associate with increased risk of short- or long-term DR worsening.

Diabetic retinopathy as a potential marker of Parkinson's disease: a register-based cohort study.

Neurodegeneration is an early event in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy, and an association between diabetic retinopathy and Parkinson's disease has been proposed. In this nationwide register-based cohort study, we investigated the prevalence and incidence of Parkinson's disease among patients screened for diabetic retinopathy in a Danish population-based cohort. Cases (n = 173 568) above 50 years of age with diabetes included in the Danish Registry of Diabetic Retinopathy between 2013 and 2018 were matched 1:5 by gender and birth year with a control population without diabetes (n = 843 781). At index date, the prevalence of Parkinson's disease was compared between cases and controls. To assess the longitudinal relationship between diabetic retinopathy and Parkinson's disease, a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was estimated. The prevalence of Parkinson's disease was 0.28% and 0.44% among cases and controls, respectively. While diabetic retinopathy was not associated with present (adjusted odds ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.21) or incident Parkinson's disease (adjusted hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.56-1.05), cases with diabetes were in general less likely to have or to develop Parkinson's disease compared to controls without diabetes (adjusted odds ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.87 and adjusted hazard ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.00). In a national cohort of more than 1 million persons, patients with diabetes were 21% and 12% were less likely to have prevalent and develop incident Parkinson's disease, respectively, compared to an age- and gender-matched control population without diabetes. We found no indication for diabetic retinopathy as an independent risk factor for incident Parkinson's disease.

Inverse Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Relationships between Diabetic Retinopathy and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Type 2 Diabetes: Results from a National Screening Program.

Purpose: In previous smaller studies, associations were demonstrated between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but longitudinal relationships have not been evaluated in larger cohorts. The aim of the present study was to assess the cross-sectional and prospective associations between DR and OSA in a national cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. Design: Cross-sectional and 5-year longitudinal registry-based cohort study. Participants: For cases, we included 153 238 patients with type 2 diabetes who had attended diabetic eye screening and were registered in the Danish Registry of Diabetic Retinopathy (DiaBase). Each of these were matched by 5 control participants without diabetes of the same age and gender (n = 746 148). Methods: Exposure and outcome data as well as systemic morbidity and use of medications were identified in national registers, including the DiaBase, the Danish National Patient Register, the Danish National Prescription Registry, and the Danish Civil Registration System. The index date was defined as the date of the first DR screening registered in DiaBase. Main Outcome Measures: Exposure was defined as present and level-specific DR, and main outcomes were crude, age- and gender-adjusted, and multivariable adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for prevalent OSA as well as hazard ratios (HR) for 5-year incident OSA and DR. Results: Patients with type 2 diabetes independently were more likely to have prevalent OSA (OR, 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95-2.08) and to develop OSA within 5 years (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.46-1.64). Patients with type 2 diabetes and DR at baseline were less likely to have prevalent OSA (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52-0.62) or to demonstrate incident OSA (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-0.99). Likewise, patients with OSA had a lower risk to develop DR (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.92). Conclusions: In a registry-based national cohort study, patients with type 2 diabetes had a higher risk of OSA. However, a 43% decreased risk of prevalent OSA was demonstrated in patients with DR, and prospectively, OSA and DR both were related inversely with each other.